Hate crimes :: essays research papers

Victims of hate law-breakings vary in the indiscretions placed against them, whether it is from a simple slander to a vicious attack. But they all hold the same mutual notion that the crimes that were committed against them are far supra former(a) crimes because they were carried out in hate. I believe that the idea of creating a separate punishment for crimes of this nature is absolutely nonsensical and inane in theory.In the attached article, it states that Congressional negotiators stripped a measure to strengthen 1960s-era hate crimes law from a massive defense bill, likely sidesplitting for this year the effort to broaden hate crimes protections for gay people and the alter (Reuters, 2004). This action, for some, it a disappointment and a big step back in their movement. Backers of the hate crimes order, a top priority for gay rights and disabled protagonism groups (Reuters, 2004) seem more interested in intensifying punishment that is just now against them. Such cases t hat they believe deserved intensification are those like the dragging shoemakers last of a black man named James Byrd in Texas (Reuters, 2004) and the fatal thrashing of a young gay man named Matthew Shepard in Wyoming (Williams, 2004). But I believe the ideals that those kind of people are fighting for is a self-conceited effort and a lost cause. Singling out crimes and criminals with the addition of hate has no added value in the context of the crime. A crime that has been committed in the essence of hate is only as valid as a crime that is not completely perpetrated out of hate. And yes, a hate crime is seen as more debauched in our growingly politically correct society, entirely under the scrutiny of law it should not be seen as a special crime in need of special punishment. In our legislation we should not make a special needs section to come across the victims of fanaticism. In our society everything and everyone is suppose to be equal, and in classifying two disparate m urderers as one being a hate murderer and the other simply a murderer is not acceptable. Now I am not trying to defend murders in my accusations but rather am trying to make a point. Crimes that are committed out of intolerance of ones beliefs or actions are no different than a crime that is committed out of pure pleasure per se.