Michael Vick may be fast and elusive on the football game game field, but he could not escape a federal indictment on interstate dog bit charges for the pecuniary funding of the dog fighting enterprise by the tell of ?Bad Newz Kennels.? Many pile be de partding that Michael Vick parcel out the upper limit sentence allowable in prison house for his involvement in illegal dog fighting and the terminus of six to eight dogs that didn?t perform well in fights. Vick deserves to be penalise ? and punished severely. However, there oblige to be reasonable limits to that penalisation. When is adequacy enough? When does the punishment outweigh the discourtesy? The justice Michael Vick exit incur from the humiliation, vilification, and demonization from general normal and the mass media, the disadvantage of income and lifestyle from the NFL, and the fines and endorsements he has already lost, will be to a greater extent than sufficient punishment for Michael Vick and the charge s that he must now example for dog fighting. The man has been an athletic celebrity since the age of sixteen, surrounded by people that refused to tell him ?no.
? From his coaches, his apprizeers, Virginia Tech, the Atlanta Falcons, Reebok, Nike, Rawlings, the National football League, ESPN or any of the sports-media companies, all of which were only too keen to featherbed Vick so long as it benefited them. Vick might have intrustd he had become a Big Man -- psyche no one could touch, someone above the rules. People who believe they are above the rules need to make up ones mind what honor means. unless only the gifted or philosophical can thatched roo! f themselves character. The overwhelming majority of men and women need help from others to agree the lessons of character. Many such lessons begin with the word no. Who in last 10 years has said no... If you beggary to get a full essay, order it on our website:
OrderCustomPaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, visit our page:
write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment