Coming to Terms Essay

In A Look at the Intersection of Fine Dining and Fast Food, Brenda Falk discusses the differences and similarities in profuse intellectual nourishment and picturesque dine. Her principal(prenominal) focus throughout the article is the refreshful found overlap in these two dining techniques. She also seems to facial expression that soon these two dining techniques could easily become one cognize as brisk casual. In this article she jumps around from consign to point whether it be reasoning behind certain dining styles, types of changes in these styles, or how they affect each other.Her argument was based fully on fast food restaurants adopting ideas from fine dining restaurants . Falk inserts an inordinate amount of her profess feelings on the topic and doesnt analyze the subject as salubrious as she should have. She focuses mainly on the fast food business plot lacking in her analysis of fine dining. She also should have do the paper more(prenominal) about what caused the changes in the restaurant business kinda of the changes themselves. In the judge Falk has many a nonher(prenominal) examples of foods and restaurants that have changed and became noticed for their modern style, such(prenominal) as Panera Bread and Chipotle.She appeals to a large audience by adding examples many people can continue too. On the other hand, her article is exceedingly biased in multiple ways. She makes too many generalizations that may not particularly be true in some(prenominal) cases. For example she states, the incident that people today hate to make choices, preferring to have the best of both(prenominal) worlds (Falk,33). This may not be exactly true for everyone. She uses the previous commendation to support her argument in saying that since people are so indecisive quick casual would be a good alternative. some other instance is when she states, There are significantly more calories at control board service restaurants (Falk, 35). The prior quote shows her bias towards dine-in restaurants because she only uses negative examples of fine dining. Furthermore, her essay is very restricted. She aims her essay towards adults and college students with her use of language and examples of certain restaurants but a lot of her writing makes you think otherwise. The core of her essay is stating that quick casual is the new alternative to fine and fast food dining.though she never takes into consideration the ideas of being a vegetarian or that college students have dining halls or even the fact that not all people rust out. She had good arguments but they did not affect the people they were meant to affect. One of her main argumentative statements is at the very end of her essay when she says, The country is focus on problems with obesity and poor take habits .. until major changes are made, food prepared at home will al closely always be healthier than food eaten away from home (Falk,36) .These type of statements should have been mo re prominent in the essay, she only brings up this type of conflict in the last paragraph and nowhere else. By tying in the eating at home or the obesity aspect more, she would have had a strong argument. As mention earlier, if she touched on all the aspects achievable that would have made her essay more relevant Some of her most outstanding focuses were abbreviate Mapping and the Trickle Down Theory. Trend mapping helps culinary experts predict which menu items will be fashionable in the future.The trickle down theory helps quick casual restaurants put forward their menu with more fine dining dishes. These ideas help customers make tonic choices. I was impressed with her inclusion of these two innovations because they go right on with her topic and fit into the main idea . Even though her essay was poorly structured at some points, there were also some good points throughout. I feel that her style was very laid bet on and readable because she used places her target audience have been and can relate to, as examples.Brenda Falk creates this article with the objective of describing the many similarities between the food attention and that the in between quick casual style is the most convenient. She successfully describes these similarities and elaborates on the new innovative style but never fully creates a legitimate argument. If she discussed more on the topic of eating at home or the factor of money or even brought in some positives of fine dining, that could have created a stronger argument. She has a great smack of organization and style but needs to focus more on her analysis of the topic.