Describe Two Explanations of the Origins of Attitudes to Food and Eating Behaviour

Describe Two Explanations of the Origins of Attitudes to fodder and Eating Behaviour. One explanation of the origins of attitudes towards food and eating behaviour is affectionate learning speculation, which emphasises the impact that observing other people can contribute on our own behaviour. P atomic number 18nts can progress to a massive personnel over their kidrens eating behaviours for a variety of reasons. The first, and perhaps most clear reason is that parents purchase and suppress the foods in their homes, and so the child would have little choice but to eat whatever their parent presented to them.The child would then grow up with this fare, and would learn it. Brown and Ogden reported consistent coefficient of correlation between parents and their children in terms of snack intake, eating motivations, and dead body dissatisfaction. some other explanation of the origins of attitudes towards food and eating behaviour are cultural influences. look into has suggeste d that body dissatisfaction and related eating concerns are to a greater extent characteristics of sporty women than mysterious or Asian women.Ball and Kennedy open up that for all ethnic groups, the long-range the time spent in Australia, the more the women reported attitudes and eating behaviours equal to Australian women, and this is known as the acculturation effect. Other studies have found that social coterie can have an influence on body dissatisfaction and dieting behaviour, finding that they are more common in higher(prenominal) shed light on individuals. Dornbusch studied 7000 American adolescents and found that higher class womanishs base a greater desire to be thin, and were more likely to diet to achieve this.However other research disputes social learning theories death and suggests that children do not just copy their parents. A report through by Birch and Fisher found that the best predictors of daughters eating behaviours were the mothers dietetic restra ints and their perception of the risk of the daughters becoming overweight. This disputes the idea that eating behaviour is affect by children directly copying their parents eating behaviour. However, this study was only carried turn up with mothers and daughters and so may suffer from gender bias.Social learning theory could in addition affects peoples eating behaviours through their peers. This shows that more than just parents affects eating behaviour, as was previously implied. Meyer and Gast studied 10-12 year olds and found a significant confirmatory correlation between peer influence and disordered eating. Although this study shows us much valuable information, we can generalise these findings to suggest how 10-12 year olds are affected. They cannot be an indicator for how older people may act, who may be considered to be less vulnerable to peer pressure.There are also many other obvious explanations as to our eating behaviours. For example, how we have evolved impacts a great deal on what we eat. We prefer fatty and sugary foods as these are what our distant ancestors would have needed to survive. Research has found that female white people are more preoccupied with their weight and participate in more weight loss behaviours. However a study by Mumford et al found that bulimia occurs more predominantly in Asian school children than their white counterparts.Striegel Moore et al also found that dimmed girls have a higher drive for to be thin than white girls. Both of these studies contest the original idea, that White people have more eating problems. Dornbusch et al found that higher class females had a greater desire to be thin. However a study done by Story et al disputes this. They found the exact opposite, that higher social class meant greater satisfaction with weight and lower rates of weight control behaviour. This shows perhaps that there is no correlation between social class and eating behaviour. This was also suggested by other studies.